EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Classical or Gravity? Which trade model best matches the UK facts?

A. Patrick Minford and Yongdeng Xu

No 12521, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We examine the empirical evidence bearing on whether UK trade is governed by a Classical model or by a Gravity model, using annual data from 1965 to 2015 and the method of Indirect Inference which has very large power in this application. The Gravity model here differs from the Classical model in assuming imperfect competition and a positive effect of total trade on productivity. We found that the Classical model passed the test comfortably, and that the Gravity model also passed it but at a rather lower level of probability, though as the test power was raised it was rejected. The two models' policy implications are similar.

Keywords: Bootstrap; indirect inference; Gravity model; Classical trade model; Uk trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F10 F14 F16 F17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12521 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Classical or Gravity? Which Trade Model Best Matches the UK Facts? (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Classical or Gravity? Which trade model best matches the UK facts? (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12521

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12521

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12521