Convergence, Endogenous Growth, and Productivity Disturbances

Charles Leung and Danny Quah ()

No 1383, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Kelly (1992) has recently shown that evidence on convergence cannot be taken as evidence against endogenous growth in general. This study uses a well-known class of stochastic growth models to show other difficulties with traditional empirical studies of convergence. Key parameters typically cannot be estimated consistently in cross-section regressions. When the parameters are assumed known, implications for convergence are unavailable except under restrictive and economically unmotivated assumptions. Those same assumptions that relate key parameters to cross-country convergence render cross-section regressions impossible to estimate consistently.

Keywords: Cross-country Dependence; Cross-country Regression; Increasing Returns; Stochastic Growth; Time-series Regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1383 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Convergence, endogenous growth, and productivity disturbances (1996)
Working Paper: Convergence, Endogenous Growth, and Productivity Disturbances (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1383

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1383

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().