Gross Worker Flows: How Does the Spanish Evidence Fit the Stylized Facts?

Pablo Antolin ()

No 1398, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper examines gross worker flows in Spain. Unemployment inflows are counter-cyclical while outflows are a-cyclical. Changes introduced in the Spanish labour market have increased the magnitude and variability of both flows, in particular inflows, without affecting the a-cyclical behaviour of outflows. Engagements and flows into employment from non-employment are pro-cyclical. Separations are a-cyclical, while flows out of employment to non-employment are counter-cyclical. Hence job-to-job movements must be pro-cyclical. Engagements and separations have responded positively to a wider variety of contractual forms. The Spanish evidence seems to be reasonably explained by the existence of a dual labour market between workers under permanent and fixed-term job contracts.

Keywords: Unemployment; and; Employment; Dynamics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1398 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gross Worker Flows: How Does the Spanish Evidence Fit the Stylized Facts? (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1398

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1398

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().