Comparing Forecast Performance with State Dependence

Barbara Rossi, Florens Odendahl and Tatevik Sekhposyan

No 15217, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We propose a novel forecast comparison methodology to evaluate models’ relative forecasting performance when the latter is a state-dependent function of economic variables. In our bench¬mark case, the relative forecasting performance, measured by the forecast loss differential, is modeled via a threshold model. Importantly, we allow the threshold that triggers the switch from one state to the next to be unknown, leading to a non-standard test statistic due to the presence of a nuisance parameter. Existing tests either assume a constant out-of-sample forecast performance or use non-parametric techniques robust to time-variation; consequently, they may lack power against state-dependent predictability. Importantly, our approach is applicable to point forecasts as well as predictive densities. Monte Carlo results suggest that our proposed test statistics perform well in ï¬ nite samples and have better power than existing tests in selecting the best forecasting model in the presence of state dependence. Our test statistics uncover “pockets of predictability†in U.S. equity premia forecasts; the pockets are a state-dependent function of stock market volatility. Models using economic predictors perform signiï¬ cantly worse than a simple mean forecast in periods of high volatility, but, in periods of low volatility, the use of economic predictors may lead to small forecast improvements.

Keywords: State dependence; Forecast evaluation; Pockets of predictability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C52 C53 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-for
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15217 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15217

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15217

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().