Sustainability or Performance? Ratings and Fund Managers’ Incentives

Nickolay Gantchev, Mariassunta Giannetti and Rachel Li

No 15945, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We show that following the introduction of Morningstar’s sustainability ratings (the “globe†ratings), mutual funds attempt to improve their globe ratings by increasing their demand for sustainable stocks. This trading behavior creates buying pressure, making stocks with high sustainability ratings overvalued. As a consequence, a tradeoff between sustainability and performance arises and the performance of funds improving their globe ratings deteriorates. As performance appears to be more important in attracting flows than sustainability, a new equilibrium emerges in which the globe ratings stop affecting investor flows and funds no longer trade to improve their globe ratings. Our results highlight the issues arising when funds are evaluated along two different dimensions that create conflicting incentives for fund managers competing for flows.

Keywords: Sustainability; ESG; Mutual funds; Fund flows; Ratings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G23 G24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-03
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15945 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15945

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15945

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().