Representation is Not Sufficient for Selecting Gender Diversity
Justus Baron,
Bernhard Ganglmair (),
Nicola Persico,
Timothy S. Simcoe and
Emanuele Tarantino
No 16002, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
One strategy for promoting female leaders in science and technology professions is to appoint more women to the committees that select leaders. Unfortunately, evidence from other settings, such as committees for selecting judges or professors, suggests this approach does not work. We use a natural experiment to test the idea that organizational norms supporting gender diversity are necessary for representation on “selectorates†to promote gender diversity among leaders in science and technology. Our empirical setting is the standard-setting organization that develops key protocols for Internet hardware and software. We find that when more women are randomly selected for the committee that appoints the organization’s leaders, the committee appoints more female leaders, but only after a set of interventions meant to increase members’ awareness of the benefits of gender diversity.
JEL-codes: D72 J16 L86 M14 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16002 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Representation is not sufficient for selecting gender diversity (2024) 
Working Paper: Representation is not sufficient for selecting gender diversity (2023) 
Working Paper: Representation Is Not Sufficient For Selecting Gender Diversity (2021) 
Working Paper: Representation is Not Sufficient for Selecting Gender Diversity (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16002
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().