Gender wage and longevity gaps and the design of retirement systems

Helmuth Cremer, Francesca Barigozzi and Jean-Marie Lozachmeur

No 16172, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We study the design of pension benefits for male and female workers. Women live longer than men but have a lower wage. Individuals can be single or live in couples who pool their incomes. Social welfare is utilitarian but an increasing concave transformation of individuals' lifetime utilities introduces the concern for redistribution between individuals with different life-spans. We derive the optimal direction of redistribution and show how it is affected by a gender neutrality rule. With singles only, a simple utilitarian solution implies redistribution from males to females. When the transformation is sufficiently concave redistribution may or may not be reversed. With couples only, the ranking of gender retirement ages is always reversed when the transformation is sufficiently concave. Under gender neutrality pension schemes must be self-selecting. With singles only this implies distortions of retirement decision and restricts redistribution across genders. With couples, a first best that implies a lower retirement age for females can be implemented by a gender-neutral system. Otherwise, gender neutrality implies equal retirement ages and restricts the possibility to compensate the shorter-lived individuals. Calibrated simulations show that when singles and couples coexist, gender neutrality substantially limits redistribution in favor of single women and fully prevents redistribution in favor of male spouses.

Keywords: Gender wage gap; Gender gap in longevity; Retirement systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H21 H31 H55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16172 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Gender wage and longevity gaps and the design of retirement systems (2023)
Working Paper: Gender wage and longevity gaps and the design of retirement systems (2023)
Working Paper: Gender wage and longevity gaps and the design of retirement systems (2023)
Working Paper: Gender wage and longevity gaps and the design of retirement systems (2023)
Working Paper: Gender Wage and Longevity Gaps and the Design of Retirement Systems (2021)
Working Paper: Gender Wage and Longevity Gaps and the Design of Retirement Systems (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16172

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16172

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().