Conflicted Analysts and Initial Coin Offerings

Alexander Wagner, Andreas Barth, Valerie Laturnus and Sasan Mansouri

No 16200, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: This paper studies the contribution of analysts to the functioning and failure of the market for Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). The assessments of freelancing analysts exhibit biases due to reciprocal interactions of analysts with ICO team members. Even favorably rated ICOs tend to fail raising some capital when a greater portion of their ratings reciprocate prior ratings. 90 days after listing on an exchange the market capitalization relative to the initial funds raised is smaller for tokens with more reciprocal ratings. These findings suggest that the failure of ICOs is related to conflicts of interest.

Keywords: Analysts; Asymmetric information; Fintech; Initial coin offering (ico) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 D83 G14 G24 L26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16200 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Conflicted Analysts and Initial Coin Offerings (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16200

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16200

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().