Voting right rotation, behavior of committee members and financial market reactions: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Open Market

Michael Ehrmann, Robin Tietz and Bauke Visser

No 16213, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Whether Federal Reserve Bank presidents have the right to vote on the U.S. monetary policy committee depends on a mechanical, yearly rotation scheme. Rotation is without exclusion: also nonvoting presidents attend and participate in the meetings of the committee. Does voting status change behavior? We find that the data go against the hypothesis that without the voting right, presidents use their public speeches and their meeting interventions to compensate for the loss of formal influence; rather, they support the hypothesis that the voting right makes presidents more involved. We also find that speeches move financial markets less in years that presidents vote. We argue that these discounts are consistent with their communication behavior.

Keywords: Voting right rotation; Monetary policy committee; Central bank communication; Fomc; Financial market response (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D71 D72 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16213 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16213

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16213

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().