The Salience of ESG Ratings for Stock Pricing: Evidence From (Potentially) Confused Investors

Aleksandra Rzeznik and Kathleen Weiss-Hanley
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Loriana Pelizzon

No 16334, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We exploit the a modification to Sustainanlytics' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating methodology, which is subsequently adopted by Morningstar, to study whether ESG ratings are salient for stock pricing. We show that the inversion of the rating scale but not new information leads some investors to make incorrect assessments about the meaning of the change in ESG ratings. They buy (sell) stocks they misconceive as ESG upgraded (downgraded) even when the opposite is true. This trading behavior exerts transitory price pressure on affected stocks. Our paper highlights the importance of ESG ratings for investors and consequently for asset prices.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Esg rating agencies; Sustainable investments; Socially responsible investing; ESG; Portfolio choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G23 G59 M14 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16334 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The salience of ESG ratings for stock pricing: Evidence from (potentially) confused investors (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16334

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16334

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().