Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity

Rafael Lalive, David Card and Fabrizio Colella

No 16619, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: In spring 2005, Austria launched a campaign to inform employers and newspapers that gender preferences in job advertisements were illegal. At the time over 40% of openings on the nation’s largest job-board specified a preferred gender. Over the next year the fraction fell to under 5%. We merge data on filled vacancies to linked employer-employee data to study how the elimination of gender preferences affected hiring and job outcomes. Prior to the campaign, most stated preferences were concordant with the firm’s existing gender composition, but a minority targeted the opposite gender - a subset we call non-stereotypical vacancies. Vacancies with a gender preference were very likely (>90%) to be filled by someone of that gender. We use pre-campaign vacancies to predict the probabilities of specifying preferences for females, males, or neither gender. We then conduct event studies of the effect of the campaign on the predicted groups. We find that the elimination of gender preferences led to a rise in the fraction of women hired for jobs likely to be targeted to men (and vice versa), increasing the diversity of hiring workplaces. Partially offsetting this effect, we find a reduction in the success of non-stereotypical vacancies in hiring the targeted gender, and indications of a decline in the efficiency of matching. For the much larger set of stereotypical vacancies, however, vacancy filling times, wages, and job durations were largely unaffected by the campaign, suggesting that the elimination of stated preferences had at most small consequences on overall job match efficiency.

Keywords: Gender preference; Workplace gender segregation; Anti-discrimination policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J16 J63 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16619 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity (2023)
Working Paper: Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity (2021)
Working Paper: Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16619

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16619

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().