Benchmarking Intensity

Anna Pavlova and Taisiya Sikorskaya

No 16909, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Benchmarking incentivizes fund managers to invest a fraction of their funds’ assets in their benchmark indices, and such demand is inelastic. We construct a measure of inelastic demand a stock attracts, benchmarking intensity (BMI), computed as its cumulative weight in all benchmarks, weighted by assets following each benchmark. Exploiting the Russell 1000/2000 cutoff, we show that changes in stocks’ BMIs instrument for changes in ownership of benchmarked investors. The resulting demand elasticities are low. We document that both active and passive fund managers buy additions to their benchmarks and sell deletions. Finally, an increase in BMI lowers future stock returns.

Keywords: Benchmark; Preferred habitat; Index effect; Demand elasticity; Mutual funds; Russell cutoff (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16909 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Benchmarking Intensity (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16909

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16909

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().