Procurement with Manipulation
Decio Coviello,
Andrea Guglielmo,
Clarissa Lotti and
Giancarlo Spagnolo
No 17063, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
Rules constraining bureaucratic discretion may limit the misuse of public funds but may also hinder government performance. Using data from Italian public works, we study whether and which procuring administrations manipulate the value of contracts to avoid crossing regulatory thresholds that limit discretion, and how this impacts procurement outcomes. We use bunching estimators to document substantial manipulation just below these thresholds, performed by administrations led by appointed officials but not by elected ones. We estimate the effects of manipulation, finding that it increases the use of discretionary procedures (restricted auctions), thereby reducing the number of bidders, and with mixed effects on rebates and positive effects on other outcomes. Specifically, it reduces the length, delays in delivery, and cost overruns of works and it increases repeated awards of contracts to less financially risky suppliers. We use a reform that shifted the discretion threshold to cross-validate our estimates. The reform reduced manipulation and the use of discretion, and worsened procurement outcomes, especially for administrations with appointed officials. This evidence is consistent with appointed administrators circumventing excessively strict rules, mainly to improve procurement outcomes, and with electoral incentives preventing other administrators from doing so. A simple procurement model where administrations may choose to manipulate at different costs provides structure to this interpretation.
Keywords: Rules; Discretion; Bunching; Thresholds; Electoral accountability; Bureaucracy; Government performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D73 H57 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17063 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17063
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17063
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().