Implicit Preferences

Tom Cunningham and Jonathan de Quidt

No 17343, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We show how simple decisions can, by themselves, reveal two layers of preference. Consider a hiring manager who always chooses a woman over a man with the same qualifications, but always chooses the man if their qualifications differ. Intuitively, these intransitive choices reveal an explicit preference for women, but an implicit preference for men. More generally, we define an implicit preference for an attribute as one whose influence increases the more the attribute is mixed with other attributes ("dilution"). We show that implicit preferences arise under a diverse set of psychological foundations: rule-based decision-making, signaling motives, and implicit associations. We prove a representation theorem for the model and show how implicit preferences can be identified from binary choices or from joint evaluation data. We apply the model to two published datasets, finding evidence for implicit risk preferences, implicit selfishness, and implicit discrimination.

JEL-codes: C90 D83 D91 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17343 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17343

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17343

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().