Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis

Zuzana Irsova, Pedro Bom, Tomas Havranek and Heiko Rachinger

No 17927, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Meta-analysis upweights studies reporting lower standard errors and hence more precision. But in empirical practice, notably in observational research, precision is not given to the researcher. Precision must be estimated, and thus can be p-hacked to achieve statistical significance. Simulations show that a modest dose of spurious precision creates a formidable problem for inverse-variance weighting and bias-correction methods based on the funnel plot. Selection models fail to solve the problem, and the simple mean can beat sophisticated estimators. Cures to publication bias may become worse than the disease. We introduce an approach that surmounts spuriousness: the Meta-Analysis Instrumental Variable Estimator (MAIVE), which employs inverse sample size as an instrument for reported variance.

JEL-codes: C15 C26 C83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17927 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis (2023)
Working Paper: Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis (2023)
Working Paper: Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17927

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17927

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().