White, Male, and Angry: A Reputation-based Rationale

Stephane Wolton

No 18084, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: From the bottom to the top of society, many white men are angry. This note provides a reputational-based rationale for this anger. Individuals care about their social status (elite vs non-elite) and their reputation (others' perception of their ability). Citizens are also uncertain about of how one becomes a member of the elite. When new information reveal that the elite is biased in favor of white men, the reputation of all white men decreases causing a payoff loss. In contrast, policies meant to reduce inequalities in the access to the elite can be supported by some white men and opposed by some individuals from the other groups. I briefly discuss how to interpret reactions to recent events (such as #Metoo and Black Lives Matter) in light of these results.

Keywords: Discrimination; Bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 J70 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18084 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18084

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18084

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().