The blurred lines of copyright infringement

Alberto Galasso

No 18237, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: This paper studies the creative process in a model where the level and direction of artistic effort are affected by judicial copyright enforcement. The analysis compares the performance of common sanctioning rules employed by U.S. courts in infringement cases and provides an economic micro-foundation for the independent creation defense in copyright law. Using a mechanism design approach, the paper highlights the benefits of complementing copyright litigation with a system of compulsory licensing. A calibration of the model to fit a leading music infringement case suggests that the damages awarded by courts may stifle creativity, as they substantially exceed those required to deter excessive entry and copying.

JEL-codes: K41 L82 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18237 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18237

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18237

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().