Voting Choice
Andrey Malenko and
Nadya Malenko
No 18397, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
Traditionally, fund managers cast votes on behalf of fund investors. Recently, there is a shift towards "pass-through voting," with fund managers offering their investors a choice: delegate their votes to the fund or vote themselves. We develop a theory of delegation of voting rights to study the implications of such voting choice. If investors have heterogeneous preferences, voting choice may decrease investor welfare because investors retain voting rights excessively, prioritizing their preferences over information. If investors have heterogeneous information, voting choice generally improves investor welfare. However, it may decrease fund managers' information collection effort, resulting in less informed voting outcomes.
Keywords: Voting; Delegation; Index funds; Externalities; pass-through voting; ESG; Preference aggregation; Information aggregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18397 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: Voting Choice (2023) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18397
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18397
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().