The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously

Martin Kretschmer, Tobias Kretschmer, Alexander Peukert and Christian Peukert

No 18517, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: The development and regulation of multi-purpose, large “foundation models†of AI seems to have reached a critical stage, with major investments and new applications announced every other day. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. Legislators globally compete to set the blueprint for a new regulatory regime. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union’s AI Act currently in the stage of final “trilogue†negotiations between the EU institutions. This legislation will likely have extra-territorial implications, sometimes called “the Brussels effect†. It also constitutes a radical departure from conventional information and communications technology policy by regulating AI ex-ante through a risk-based approach that seeks to prevent certain harmful outcomes based on product safety principles. We offer a review and critique, specifically discussing the AI Act’s problematic obligations regarding data quality and human oversight. Our proposal is to take liability seriously as the key regulatory mechanism. This signals to industry that if a breach of law occurs, firms are required to know in particular what their inputs were and how to retrain the system to remedy the breach. Moreover, we suggest differentiating between endogenous and exogenous sources of potential harm, which can be mitigated by carefully allocating liability between developers and deployers of AI technology.

Keywords: Product; liability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L86 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18517 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18517

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18517

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().