Interventions Versus Customer Transactions: An Alternative Test of the Signalling Hypothesis

Andreas Fischer () and Mathias Zurlinden

No 1864, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: The intra-daily efficacy of interventions by the Swiss National Bank (SNB) is examined for the 1986–94 period. The paper extends results from earlier studies because it uses the actual intervention exchange rates and all SNB interventions are known to the market. Our test of the signalling hypothesis, which distinguishes between interventions and customer transactions, is similar in spirit to US studies that exploit the informational differences between reported and unreported interventions. A key finding is that only initial interventions matter; customer transactions and subsequent interventions have no influence.

Keywords: exchange rate intervention; signalling hypothesis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1864 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1864

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1864

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().