Experience, Narratives, and Climate Change Beliefs
Milena Djourelova,
Ruben Durante,
Elliot Motte and
Eleonora Patacchini
No 18738, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
Linking the location and timing of US-based natural disasters to large-scale electoral survey data, we study how the experience of a natural disaster affects climate change beliefs and how experience interacts with ideology. Contrary to the predictions of standard learning models, we find evidence for divergence in beliefs: exposure to the same disaster event increases stated climate change and environmental concerns among liberals but decreases them among conservatives, widening the ideological gap by 11-17%. We further provide evidence of conflicting ideological media discourse on climate change in the aftermath of disasters by applying GPT as a novel text annotation approach. Our findings are consistent with natural disasters making the debate around climate change and partisan cleavages on this issue more salient and further polarizing initial beliefs. We discuss implications for the timing of efforts to build consensus on climate action.
Keywords: Climate change; Narratives; Salience; Mass media; Political polarization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 H84 Q54 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18738 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18738
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18738
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().