How Much Should We Trust Observational Estimates? Accumulating Evidence Using RCTs with Imperfect Compliance

David Rhys Bernard, Gharad Bryan, Sylvain Chabe-Ferret, Jonathan de Quidt, Jasmin Claire Fliegner and Roland Rathelot

No 18794, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The use of observational methods remains common in program evaluation. How much should we trust these studies, which lack clear identifying variation? We propose adjusting confidence intervals to incorporate the uncertainty due to observational bias. Using data from 44 development RCTs with imperfect compliance (ICRCTs), we estimate the parameters required to construct our confidence intervals. The results show that, after accounting for potential bias, observational studies have low effective power. Using our adjusted confidence intervals, a hypothetical infinite sample size observational study has a minimum detectable effect size of over 0.3 standard deviations. We conclude that – given current evidence – observational studies are uninformative about many programs that in truth have important effects. There is a silver lining: collecting data from more ICRCTs may help to reduce uncertainty about bias, and increase the effective power of observational program evaluation in the future.

Date: 2024-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18794 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18794

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18794

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().