A Note on the Differences between European and International Methodologies of Banking Regulation and Supervision

Charles Goodhart and Hideki Sato

No 18840, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Although monetary policy is the main tool for central banking in order to control inflation/deflation, micro- and macroprudential instruments are also essential for crisis management. In this paper, we aim to clarify the differences between European and international banking methodologies. The European approach as represented by the European Banking Union, is based on a harder legalistic approach, whereas the international approach implemented by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has a soft-law methodology. We propose two comparative standpoints: “uniformity†versus “diversity†, and a “legislative†versus "principle-based†approach

JEL-codes: E58 F36 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18840 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18840

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18840

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().