Is the Bar Higher for Female Scholars? Evidence from Career Steps in Economics

Niels Johannesen and Simon Muchardt

No 18892, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Do gender disparities in academia reflect that female scholars are held to higher standards than males? We address this question by comparing the scientific merit of male and female academic economists who make the same career step. Across four domains - i.e. faculty positions, network affiliations, research grants and editor appointments - we find no evidence that standards are higher for females. By contrast, the average female has less citations and publications than the average male who makes the same career step. In most domains, this reflects a gender gap for "marginal" scholars, consistent with lower merit thresholds for females.

Keywords: Gender gap; Discrimination; Gender differences; Academic labor markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 I23 J16 J44 J62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18892 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18892

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18892

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().