 No–Poaching Clauses in Franchise Contracts: Anticompetitive or Efficiency Enhancing?Francine Lafontaine, Saattvic Saattvic and Margaret Slade No 19548, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research Abstract: No-poaching clauses (NPCs) have recently come under scrutiny due to their potentially anti-competitive impact on wages. However they can also enhance efficiency. We use data from the US chain restaurant industry to assess the effect that such clauses have on wages and we find robust evidence of a negative impact. Specifically, the legal cases, proposed legislation, and negative attention surrounding NPCs, which led many chains to remove such clauses from their contracts, caused wages in those chains to rise by about 5% relative to chains that did not have NPCs. We show that the impact of removal is greater for franchisors with larger shares of the job ad market, which is a measure of the job opportunities that are denied to their employees under NPCs. We also find that the effect of the clauses on the wages of managers is not statistically different from the effect on the wages of workers. We attribute these wage effects to the removal of frictions and barriers to labor mobility. Keywords: Franchising (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19548 Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.