Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: the POUM Hypothesis

Roland Benabou and Efe Ok

No 1955, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Even relatively poor people oppose high rates of redistribution because of the anticipation that they, or their children, may move up the income ladder. This ‘Prospect of Upward Mobility’ (POUM) hypothesis is commonly advanced to explain why democracies do not engage in large-scale progressive redistributions. But is it compatible with rational expectations, given that not everyone can end up richer than average? This paper establishes the formal basis for the POUM hypothesis. There is a range of incomes below average where agents oppose lasting redistributions, provided tomorrow’s expected income is increasing and concave in today’s income. The laissez-faire coalition is larger the more concave the transition function and the longer the political horizon. We illustrate the general analysis with an example (calibrated to the United States) where three-quarters of families are always poorer than average, yet a two-thirds majority has expected future incomes above the mean. We also analyse mobility matrices from the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID) and find significant evidence of the POUM effect.

Keywords: Income Distribution; Inequality; Political Economy; social mobility; Taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D72 H20 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1955 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis (2001)
Working Paper: Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: the POUM Hypothesis (1999)
Working Paper: Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis (1998)
Working Paper: Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1955

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1955

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().