EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A New Interpretation of U.S. Productivity Growth Dynamics, 1950-2023

Robert J. Gordon and Hassan Sayed

No 19569, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper provides a unified framework that resolves recent puzzles in U.S. productivity growth that we show are interrelated. First, why was productivity growth in the 2010-19 decade the slowest of any decade in U.S. history? Second, why did the cyclicality of productivity growth change from procyclical in 1950-85 to acyclical in 1986-2006 and then back to procyclical in 2010-19? Third, why was productivity growth strongly countercyclical in the recessions of 2008-09 and 2020? The fundamental dynamic driving cyclical productivity fluctuations originates in the gradual adjustment of hours of work to demand-driven output fluctuations due to the costs of hiring and firing labor. Since productivity growth is a residual, equal to output growth less hours growth, productivity growth immediately jumps in response to an upward output movement because hours are slow to respond; then productivity growth falls back in subsequent quarters as hours complete their adjustment. We are able to explain the temporary 1986-2006 disappearance of procyclicality as the result of changes in the standard deviation and serial correlation of output changes. We explain countercyclical productivity surges in 2008-09 and 2020 by showing that business firms in those two episodes overreacted with “excess layoffs,†cutting hours in response to the sharp output decline with a much higher elasticity than normal. By coupling these excess layoffs with a post-recession rehiring effect that gradually unwound the excess layoffs, our regression analysis explains why productivity growth on average was so slow in 2010-19. If this recession/rehiring effect had not occurred, productivity growth in the 2010-19 decade would have been 1.9 percent per year instead of 1.1 percent, suggesting that concern about U.S. “secular stagnation†has been overstated.

Keywords: Productivity; Growth; Secular stagnation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 J24 J63 O30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19569 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19569

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19569

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-29
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19569