The Costs of Being Sustainable

Emanuele Chini, Kräussl, Roman and Denitsa Stefanova

No 19703, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We assess the sustainability footprint of mutual funds through the companies they hold. Instead of rely- ing on ESG ratings, the sustainability of each company is measured based on its average impact—positive or negative—on the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We document that mutual funds aligned with the SDGs attract more inflows only when they explicitly adopt a sustainability mandate. In con- trast, funds without such a mandate see reduced inflows as their alignment with the SDGs increases. It is the negative component that predominantly drives these patterns, suggesting that investors tend to exclude funds with negative SDG alignment rather than increasing capital inflows towards funds with positive SDG contribu- tions. Despite investors’ preference for sustainable funds, their actions are primarily focused on avoiding harm through divestments from non-sustainable into “neutral†funds rather than shifting capital towards funds that positively contribute to the SDGs.

JEL-codes: G11 G23 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19703 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19703

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19703

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().