Adding Fuel to the (Gun)Fire: How Politicians Polarize the Public Debate

Lehan Zhang, Gabriele Gratton, Pauline Grosjean and Hasin Yousaf

No 19896, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We show how politicians polarize policy-relevant public debates. Analyzing 4.75 million tweets about 57 mass shootings events (2016-2022) with two-way fixed effects and event studies methodologies, we show that the partisan and tribal content of tweets---our measure of online polarization---systematically increases after a politician first tweets about an event. Our detailed analysis of the timing of political interventions suggests that politicians do not intervene in response to specific characteristics of the debate or the event, nor to immediate changes in the debate. Interventions by other (not politicians) focal influencers do not polarize the public debate. We show how the rhetorical supply of politicians explains the unique polarizing effect of political interventions.

Keywords: Twitter; Partisanship; Polarization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 L86 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19896 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19896

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19896

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().