Internal Communication and Remote Work

Raj Choudhury, Miguel Espinosa, Tarun Khanna, Christos Makridis and Kyle Schirmann

No 19920, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The rapid adoption of hybrid work by firms has led to a debate between managers and workers on the relative value of remote and in-person communication. Colocation between workers may be helpful for communication, aid with coordination, and affect the intensity of monitoring of workers by managers. Exploiting a hybrid work field experiment involving HR workers and using unique data related to the text of electronic communication between employees, this paper provides causal evidence of how colocation between employees affects internal communication within firms. A machine learning analysis of email content reveals that colocation is a substitute for horizontal, coordination-related communication, but---somewhat surprisingly---a complement to vertical, monitoring-related communication.

JEL-codes: J23 J24 O10 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19920 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19920

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19920

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().