Taxes on Lifetime Income: A Good Idea?

Dirk Krueger and Chunzan Wu

No 20134, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: In standard life-cycle models, household consumption and welfare more strongly depend on lifetime income, but most countries base income taxes on current income and use progressive taxes to reduce inequality and provide social insurance. Is lifetime income a better tax base for governments seeking to provide such social insurance and redistribution? To answer this question, we build a quantitative life-cycle model of heterogeneous households with idiosyncratic wage risks and endogenous labor supply, and calibrate it to the U.S. economy. We document that switching to a lifetime income tax leads to a more efficient distribution of hours worked over time and across states of the world. This benefit rises with tax progressivity under a lifetime income tax, whereas the opposite is true under an annual income tax. Consequently, the optimal lifetime income tax is more progressive and achieves larger ex-ante welfare for a cohort of households than the optimal annual income tax.

Keywords: Redistribution; Social insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E60 H20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20134 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20134

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20134

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().