 Dialogue in Political Advertising: Evidence from U.S. Political Campaigns 2012-2020Simon Anderson, Federico Ciliberto and Benjamin Leyden No 20301, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research Abstract: We study the nature and determinants of dialogue between political candidates in television advertising. We characterize dialogue as both candidates advertising on the same campaign theme (e.g., “Economic Policy†). We model candidates’ propensity to engage in dialogue and link race competitiveness with messaging overlap. We show that it is theoretically ambiguous whether more competitiveness increases dialogue. Using data on television advertising for U.S. House and Senate races from 2012 to 2020, we document rich heterogeneity in dialogue across races and within races over time. Candidates strategically avoid dialogue; we find that dialogue is lower than predicted by a “non-strategic†advertising benchmark. Finally, we investigate the determinants of dialogue, including race competitiveness, time until the election, and election type, separating the effects of these characteristics on selection into advertising and messaging similarity. We find that dialogue increases with competitiveness, though this effect is dominated by its impact on selection into advertising. JEL-codes: D72 D83 L15 M37 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20301 Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.