Green Capital Requirements

Martin Oehmke and Marcus Opp

No 20437, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We study bank capital requirements as a tool to address climate-related financial risks and evaluate whether a prudential mandate for bank regulators remains appropriate in the presence of carbon externalities. We show that a prudential mandate maximizes welfare if carbon taxes are set optimally and fully characterize optimal capital requirements under such a mandate. Optimal transition-risk adjustments can crowd out clean lending. When carbon pricing is insufficient, using capital requirements to address externalities can require sacrificing financial stability or prove altogether ineffective. Capital requirements can play an indirect role by mitigating stranded asset risk, thereby making future carbon taxes credible.

JEL-codes: G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20437 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20437

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20437

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().