A Cost-Benefit Approach to Optimizing Security Precaution Adoption
Noa Barnir,
Neil Gandal,
Tyler Moore and
Vincent Scott
No 20562, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
Purpose: All U.S defense contractors were required to have fully implemented the 110 security requirements included in NIST Special Publication 800-171 entitled “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations†by 1 January 2018 whenever a system owned, or operated by or for, a contractor processes, stores, or transmits controlled unclassified information (CUI). Despite the mandate, adoption has been minimal, mostly because the requirement is so costly and time-consuming that medium and small firms cannot afford to comply. Since the adoption of security precautions is costly and time-consuming, in this paper, we propose a constrained optimization methodology to examine this issue. Design and Methodology: In this paper, we introduce a method to significantly reduce the number of required precautions by soliciting expert opinion as to the perceived benefits and costs of all precautions. We defined the difference between benefits and costs as value. Findings: In the key constrained optimization exercise we conduct, we show that including only the top 50 security precautions (out of the 110 security precautions) led to just a very small decline in value. Originality: This paper makes an important contribution to information security research. To the best of our knowledge, no one has conducted similar analysis on the 110 proposed precautions. Note - Forthcoming, Information and Computer Security 2025
Keywords: Cost benefit analysis; security precautions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20562 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20562
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20562
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().