Bankruptcy Law and the Market for Corporate Influence

Mike Burkart, Samuel Lee and Vladimir Vladimirov

No 20780, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The canonical view of bankruptcy law is that it solves a market failure by imposing a collective choice process that supplants the market. We propose that bankruptcy law instead catalyzes the market if that process provides scope for rent seeking. Considering collective action problems as the central friction, as in the canonical theory, we argue that such a law induces activist investing that improves the efficiency of distressed restructuring. This expands the purview of bankruptcy law from a focus on bargaining issues to an active role in regulating corporate control contestability. We interpret the evolution of Chapter 11 and the surrounding market environment through this lens.

Keywords: Bankruptcy law; Chapter 11; Free-rider problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G20 G33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20780 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20780

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20780

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().