EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Chaste Widowhood

Melanie Meng Xue

No 21806, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Why did chaste widowhood become so prominent in late imperial China? Existing explanations emphasize Confucian moral discourse, lineage honor, state recognition, and concerns over female chastity. I examine whether population growth contributed to the formation and strengthening of cultural expectations that attached moral value to widow non-remarriage. By making non-remarriage publicly valuable, chaste widowhood could restrict widows' return to fertility-bearing unions, a post-marital margin of China's preventive checks. I combine two newly assembled datasets: nationwide Chinese genealogy microdata and chaste-woman cases from the Ming Shilu. In prefecture-by-period fixed-effects panels, a larger local male population is associated with more chaste-woman cases. In the 50-year panel, a doubling of the population measure is associated with about 8 percent more cases. The relationship remains positive after accounting for genealogy coverage and composition, observed widowhood events, and local recognition capacity. It is not stronger in places with greater state reach. The evidence suggests that population growth contributed to the development and growing force of cultural expectations surrounding widow non-remarriage.

Keywords: Culture; Gender; Fertility; Population Pressure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J12 J13 N35 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP21806 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21806

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP21806

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().

 
Page updated 2026-08-12
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21806