Tax Competition and Economic Geography
Fredrik Andersson () and
Rikard Forslid ()
No 2220, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Tax competition between two countries is considered in a trade-and-location setting with differentiated products and monopolistic competition. There are two groups of workers, mobile ones and immobile ones. Taxes are used for producing a public good. It is shown that an equilibrium with mobile workers dispersed across countries is destabilised by increased taxes on these - and this is shown to be true also for perfectly coordinated tax increases. It is also shown that an agglomeration is taxable, and that increasing public spending may relax the tax pressure on immobile workers consistent with preserving an agglomeration for some levels of taxes.
Keywords: Agglomeration; Economic Geography; Tax Competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F12 F15 F21 R12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (33) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Journal Article: Tax Competition and Economic Geography (2003)
Working Paper: Tax Competition and Economic Geography (2000)
Working Paper: Tax Competition and Economic Geography (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2220
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=2220
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ..
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .