Is The Use Of The WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?

Henrik Horn, Petros C Mavroidis and Håkan Nordström

No 2340, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: The larger trading nations have been the main users of the WTO Dispute Settlement system during its first four years of existence (1995-1998). This has prompted a debate about whether the DS system is biased against smaller and poorer countries, for example, because of a lack of legal capacities and retaliatory power. This paper shows that a simple model in which countries bring disputes proportionally to the diversity and value of exports explains fairly well the dispute pattern. Differences in legal capacities appear to play some role, while 'power' considerations do not seem to matter.

Keywords: Dispute Settlement; WTO (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F02 F13 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (51)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=2340 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2340

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=2340

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().