Fast Track or Failure: A Study of the Completion Rates of Graduate Students in Economics
Geert Ridder () and
Jan van Ours ()
No 2363, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
This paper presents an analysis of the failure and completion rates of graduate students in economics at three universities in The Netherlands. We find that an indicator of the research productivity of the supervisor is an important determinant of the completion and dropout rates. However, this effect seems due to the fact that supervisors with a good research record attract and select better students. There is no evidence of an independent effect of having a supervisor who is an active researcher.
Keywords: Duration Analysis; Education; Graduate Program (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C41 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at email@example.com
Working Paper: Fast track or failure: A study of the completion rate of graduate students in economics (2003)
Working Paper: Fast Track or Failure: A Study of the Completion Rates of Graduate Students in Economics (2000)
Working Paper: Fast track or Failure: A Study of the Completion Rates of Graduate Students in Economics (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2363
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=2363
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ..
Series data maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .