EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Consumption and Aggregate Constraints: Evidence from US States and Canadian Provinces

Oved Yosha, Sørensen, Bent E and Charlotte Ostergaard
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Bent E. Sorensen

No 2947, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: State-level consumption exhibits excess sensitivity to lagged income to the same extent as US aggregate data, but state-specific (idiosyncratic) consumption exhibits substantially less sensitivity to lagged stste-specific income - a result that also holds for Canadian provinces. We propose the following interpretation: borrowing and lending in response to changes in consumer demand is easier for an individual US state than it is for the US as a whole. The PIH may thus be a good model for describing the reaction of consumption to idiosynctratic disposable income shocks even if it fails at the aggregate US level. Further analysis, centered on the persistence of income shocks and on the consumption/income ratio, is consistent with this interpretation but suggests that the PIH still requires qualification. We contrast our results with tests of full inter-state risk sharing.

Keywords: Consumption; Excess sensitivity; Permanent income; Risk sharing; Us states; Canadian provinces; Regional macroeconomics; Excess smoothness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP2947 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Consumption and Aggregate Constraints: Evidence from U.S. States and Canadian Provinces (2002) Downloads
Working Paper: Consumption and aggregate constraints: evidence from U.S. states and Canadian provinces (2000) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2947

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP2947

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2947