What Will Take the Con Out of Econometrics?

Michael McAleer and Adrian Pagan

No 39, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The paper begins with the question of whether Leamer's Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) really does "Take the Con Out of Econometrics" By analytically demonstrating that the extreme bounds are simply functions of the F-statistic for the deletion of variables from a regression, we conclude that the information provided by EBA represents no advance over that available from traditional methods. Furthermore, there is a degree of arbitrariness in EBA which exactly parallels the selective reporting of regressions it was designed to supplant. The last part of the paper attempts a positive response to its title. By following a well defined series of modelling steps, we maintain that Cooley and Le Roy's EBA-derived conclusions concerning the interest elasticity of money demand owe more to a faulty methodology than to the data.

Keywords: Econometric Models; Extreme Bounds Analysis; Methodology; Statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (104)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=39 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: What Will Take the Con out of Econometrics? (1985)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:39

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... apers/dp.php?dpno=39

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().