EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pension Fund Governance and the Choice Between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans

Timothy Besley and Andrea Prat

No 3955, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Recent events in several countries have underscored the importance of good governance in private occupational pension plans. The present Paper uses contract theory to analyse the interplay of residual claims and control rights in private pensions. The residual claimant is the plan sponsor in a defined benefit (DB) plan and the pool of beneficiaries in a defined contribution (DC) plan. The main control rights we examine relate to decisions on funding, asset allocation, and asset management. Under complete contracting, governance can be shown to be neutral: DC and DB plans differ only on risk allocation. If instead contracts are incomplete, a DB (DC) plan should: (1) Assign more vigilance responsibility to the sponsor (beneficiaries); (2) Rely less (more) on trustees; (3) Tend to employ trustees that are professional experts (caring insiders); (4) Assign asset allocation rights to the sponsor (beneficiaries); (5) have strict funding requirements.

Keywords: Pension fund; Governance; Private pension (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3955 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Pension fund governance and the choice between defined benefit and defined contribution plans (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: Pension fund governance and the choice between defined benefit and defined contribution plans (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3955

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3955

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3955