Financial Contracting with Optimistic Entrepreneurs: Theory and Evidence
David Thesmar and
Augustin Landier
No 3971, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
This Paper looks at the effects of entrepreneurial optimism on financial contracting and corporate performance. Optimism may increase effort, but is bad for adaptation decisions as the entrepreneur underweights negative information. The first-best contract with an optimist uses contingencies to ?bridge the gap in beliefs?. When only debt contracts are possible, we show that insurance motives lead realists to prefer long-term debt, whereas short-term debt is the optimal contract for optimists. With short-term debt, the investor: (1) gets cash-flow claims on states that the optimistic entrepreneur finds relatively unlikely, and the entrepreneur gets as much as possible from the states that they ?dream to be true?; (2) gets control in states where the optimistic entrepreneur would behave inefficiently, which decreases the ex-ante cost of capital. We confront our theory with a large dataset of entrepreneurs. We find that differences in beliefs may be (partly) explained by usual determinants put forward in psychology and management literature. We find that firms run by optimists tend to be grow less, die sooner and be less profitable, which we view as a confirmation that our measure of optimism does not proxy high risk-high return projects. Finally, in line with the prediction of our theory, we find that optimists tend to put in more effort, and use more short-term debt to finance their ventures.
Keywords: Entreprenuership; Financing structure; Optimism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D84 G32 M13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn and nep-ent
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3971 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3971
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3971
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().