Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?
Luca Anderlini,
Leonardo Felli and
Andrew Postlewaite
No 4197, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
We find an economic rationale for the common sense answer to the question in our title - courts should not always enforce what the contracting parties write. We describe and analyse a contractual environment that allows a role for an active court. An active court can improve on the outcome that the parties would achieve without it. The institutional role of the court is to maximize the parties? welfare under a veil of ignorance. We study a buyer-seller model with asymmetric information and ex-ante investments, in which some contingencies cannot be contracted on. The court must decide when to uphold a contract and when to void it. The parties know their private information at the time of contracting, and this drives a wedge between ex-ante and interim-efficient contracts. In particular, some types pool in equilibrium. By voiding some contracts that the pooling types would like the court to enforce, the court is able to induce them to separate, and hence to improve ex-ante welfare.
Keywords: Optimal courts; Informational externalities; Parties' ex-ante welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 L14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP4197 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Journal Article: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2011) 
Working Paper: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2009) 
Working Paper: Should Courts always Enforce what Contracting Parties Write? (2006) 
Working Paper: Should courts always enforce what contracting parties write? (2006) 
Working Paper: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2006) 
Working Paper: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2006) 
Working Paper: Should courts always enforce what contracting parties write? (2003) 
Working Paper: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2003) 
Working Paper: Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4197
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP4197
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().