Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the RBC Model Fit Post-War US Data?
GalÃ, Jordi and
Pau Rabanal
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Jordi Galí
No 4522, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
Our answer: not so well. We reach that conclusion after reviewing recent research on the role of technology as a source of economic fluctuations. The bulk of the evidence suggests a limited role for aggregate technology shocks, pointing instead to demand factors as the main force behind the strong positive co-movement between output and labor input measures.
Keywords: Real business cycles; Technology shocks; Nominal rigidities; Real frictions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (73)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP4522 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the RBC Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data? (2004) 
Working Paper: Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the RBS Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data? (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4522
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP4522
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().