Against 'Gender-based taxation'

Gilles Saint-Paul

No 6582, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: This paper criticizes the Alesina and Ichino (2007) proposal of taxing men more than women. First, the proposal is outright sex discrimination. Second, it cannot be Pareto-improving. Third, its virtues in terms of efficiency are better obtained by gender-neutral voluntary schemes for taxing households. Fourth, the tax would further undermine marriage.

Keywords: Sex; Taxation; Gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H2 J2 J3 J7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe and nep-pub
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6582 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6582

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6582

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().