Black Man?s Burden: Measured Philanthropy in the British Empire, 1880-1913

Marc Flandreau, Frederic Zumer, Olivier Accominotti and Riad Rezzik

No 6811, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Ferguson and Schularick (2006) recently provided a measure of the effect of Empire subjection on borrowing countries? interest rates. They find this effect to be large and significant, ranging between 80 to 180 basis points. We argue that their methodology is inadequate and that their estimates are biased. The reason is that Empire subjection did not affect borrowing conditions at the margin, as they assume, but structurally. We also develop a new approach of the incidence of colonial rule on market access. It suggests that the benefits of Empire were unevenly distributed. It shows that the main incidence of colonial rule was to create financial incentives to adopt development policies that encouraged government spending.

Keywords: Bond spreads; Credibility; Development; Empire; Institutions; Legal frameworks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 N20 O16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6811 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6811

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6811

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().