Why Don't Women Patent?

Jennifer Hunt, Jean-Philippe Garant, Hannah Herman and David Munroe

No 9185, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We investigate women's underrepresentation among holders of commercialized patents: only 5.5% of holders of such patents are female. Using the National Survey of College Graduates 2003, we find only 7% of the gap in patenting rates is accounted for by women's lower probability of holding any science or engineering degree, because women with such a degree are scarcely more likely to patent than women without. Differences among those without a science or engineering degree account for 15%, while 78% is accounted for by differences among those with a science or engineering degree. For the latter group, we find that women's underrepresentation in engineering and in jobs involving development and design explain much of the gap.

Keywords: Gender; Innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J15 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-ino, nep-ipr and nep-pr~
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP9185 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Don't Women Patent? (2012)
Working Paper: Why Don't Women Patent? (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9185

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP9185

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().