EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Stephen versus Stephanie? Does Gender Matter for Peer-to-Peer Career Advice

Warn Lekfuangfu and Grace Lordan

No 26045, RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series from ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin)

Abstract: Occupational segregation is one of the major causes of the gender pay gap. We probe the possibility that individual beliefs regarding gender stereotypes established in childhood contribute to gendered sorting. Using an experiment with two vignette designs, which was carried out in schools in the UK, we consider whether students aged 15-16 years recommend that a fictitious peer pursue different college majors and career paths simply because of their gender. We find strong evidence that this is the case. The within-majors treatment design shows that our respondents are 11 percentage points more likely to recommend corporate law to a male peer. The across-majors design reveals that students presented with a male fictitious peer tend to recommend degrees that have lower shares of females to males.

Keywords: Occupational choice; College major choice; Vignette design; Gender; Gender Stereotype; Sorting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I2 J16 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rfberlin.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/26045.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Stephen versus Stephanie? Does Gender Matter for Peer-to-Peer Career Advice (2026) Downloads
Working Paper: Stephen versus Stephanie? Does Gender Matter for Peer-to-Peer Career Advice (2023) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crm:wpaper:26045

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series from ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Moritz Lubczyk () and Matthew Nibloe ().

 
Page updated 2026-03-10
Handle: RePEc:crm:wpaper:26045