Trends, Random Walks, and Tests of the Permanent Income Hypothesis
Matthew Shapiro and
N. Gregory Mankiw ()
No 725, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers from Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University
Recent studies find that consumption is excessively sensitive to income. These studies assume that income is stationary around a deterministic trend. The data, however, do not reject the hypothesis that disposable income is a random walk with drift. If income is indeed a random walk, then the standard testing procedure is greatly biased toward finding excess sensitivity. Moreover, if income is borderline stationary, this procedure is also seriously biased.
Keywords: Non-stationary time series; detrending; permanent income hypothesis; small sample bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: CFP 628.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Monetary Economics (1985), 16: 165-174
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Trends, random walks, and tests of the permanent income hypothesis (1985)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:725
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Cowles Foundation, Yale University, Box 208281, New Haven, CT 06520-8281 USA
The price is None.
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers from Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University Yale University, Box 208281, New Haven, CT 06520-8281 USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matthew Regan ().